If you want to know what’s cooking in Canada, stop being such a deep thinker. This is elementary stuff, a tactical template of takeover and ultimate Balkanisation. Quebec is an attractive enclosure to global corporations so they’ll have their gateau and eat it too or as the Mafiosi like to say, set their mark and enforce it!
Rising nationalism is always the first clue that inside jokers from the globalist gang are busy agitating but by the looks of PQ’s flip-flop policy, first supporting and then forgetting the protesting students it’s a guarantee that Le wrecking crew is here. Victory speeches were cut short by gunfire and mayhem perpetrated by a cartoonish actor in a bathrobe, a typical camp Rosbif who just hates sugar sweet Pauline Marois, what a good TV plot!
The alleged gunman raining lead on the victory party was said to have shouted; “The English are awakening!” en Francais. No merde, not a day goes by without some mind bending political manipulation of one sort or another hitting the airwaves to cry “wolf”. It’s not such a neat trick, they build apathy, globalists don’t want us ready when the real manure hits the big fan. The news template works perfectly every time and it’s common thread is always a high incidence of co-incidence whose provenance is from due South!
Washington’s Beltway Bandidos have unequaled expertise in making things go bang in more ways than one! In the war zones they oversee, bloodshed is the common muck they leave behind but on the North American continent, an entirely different set of rules applies. There, the public only needs to be scared rather than bombed into submission through the mesmerising spells, broadly cast by the greatest alphabet agency, NEWS!
In acronym rich D.C., it simply means Not Exactly What’s Said! It’s another one of those words we think we understand fully but which has meanings too numerous to mention. Horrific events, which controlled media daily sears into the public psyche are for the most part staged cautionary tales with a quantum strength psychological sting in the tail yet they are legally presented as factual reporting, somehow. It’s the phonetics we must focus upon to discern the source of vile attack on our brains, best defined in the Greek;
‘Nous, sometimes equated to intellect or intelligence, is a philosophical term for the faculty of the human mind which is described in classical philosophy as necessary for understanding what is true or real, similar in meaning to intuition. It is also often described as a form of perception which works within the mind (“the mind’s eye“), rather than only through the physical senses.[2] The three commonly used philosophical terms are from Greek, νοῦς or νόος, and Latin intellectus and intelligentia respectively.’
My how they love that word intelligence, now you see the double-cross, maybe it’s not such a nasty world we inhabit after all! Quebec’s troubles are no different from any other theatre of covert war in which the usual suspects have a hand in the matter and who dares wins. Their agents north of the border, particularly one Stephen Harper, have laid the groundwork for Balkanisation in Canada by stoking the nationalist tension and it’s not just the mineral extractors who stand to benefit from today’s revenue-rich chaos.
American banks floating the Student Loan scam, which adds up to nothing more than one’s diabolical entry into indentured servitude are already in the black, they helped shut universities, provoked people to form mobs. Their partners Parti Quebecois, nationalist nincompoops in the quick march to power feigned support for the kids then wangled a galvanising event pitting the forces of French-speaking separatists against crazed English colonials to achieve heart-rending tragedy by pure coincidence, cough. Plus ca change!
Oh, and they said there was a dead guy. You know the drill by now…
Whatever the ’cause’ seems like there’s always a whack job with a gun ready to cry havoc and prove to the world how important they are. Look at me Mom…I made the New$!
Craving attention, by whatever means, is nothing more than a cry for help from a damaged mind. Publicity of any kind only stokes the fires and provides its own form of ‘validation’ – you’d have thought by now we would have learnt to just ignore the crazies.
Without the validation they gain through publicity their immitators would loose a signifcant motivator.
Think of it this way – if stories like this weren’t publicised how many lives could be saved? I’m guessing quite a few, your ‘average’ murderer typically kills only once and gets less than a couple of minutes press coverage before being rightly forgoten by history.
Even something as simple as this article only serves to give them more ‘recognition’ than they deserve, by creating ‘connections with larger issues.
By: Becky Bbear on September 10, 2012
at 6:53 am
@Becky
I don’t know which article you’re commenting on.
There are no whack jobs in the NEWS, it’s ALL fiction.
Those whom the gods will destroy they first drive to madness etc….
By: rmiglobal on September 10, 2012
at 7:55 am
Righto. Four or five media conglomerates own the world news outlets. These corporations all have their representatives attend the same thinktank meetings, to ensure proper alignment with the political interests of the planet’s 162 privately-owned central banks.
Central banking control has been going on for generations. We were all born into this. The system is elaborate and sophisticated, and it knows how to manipulate the masses with ease, right down the individual level — many of your friends are now regularly regurgitating the ideas passed to them through this system of total control.
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, located in London, UK, is the private organization that intelligence agencies hire to coordinate global media messaging, in accordance with central banker planning.
We are being farmed: socially and biologically engineered, to make us docile, passive, and programmable. The New World Order is here, and it is alive and well and all around you.
Just ask your friends what the Bank of International Settlements is, or what the Tavistock Institute is. When the masses are ignorant of the existence of the world’s most powerful institutions, the New World Order is therefore thriving beyond one’s wildest imagination.
By: Spork on September 10, 2012
at 9:21 pm
The Bank of International Settlements is a financial institution established by the League of Nations following WWI, to process and administer repartions payments by Germany. Following WWII it continued to carry out the same role.
It latter evolved into a central ‘support mechanism’ for European Central Banks, providing financial, reporting, clearing and other services across its very specific sector. The Bank’s only members are Central Banks and its services are not open to individuals.
What more is there to know about it? All of its activities are common knowledge.
The Tavistock Institute is a little more complex, being a ‘think tank’ with fairly solid links to particular political views and theories on governance.
Anyone considering the Institutes working papers, reports and publications can see the underlying ‘message’ and make their own assessment of its political leanings.
Again, what more is there to know?
It’s a pretty big assumption that ‘the masses’ – which seems to be a reference to the Public generally – are either ill-informed or ignorant on such subjects. Anyone with access to the internet and an interest in either organisation, or the various conspiracy theories associated with them, is quite capable of forming their own informed opinion from the available information.
Suggesting that only particular interpretations or opinions are ‘correct’ is nothing more than hubris. Common sense isn’t called that for no good reason – it’s common.
By this, I mean that within the context of conspiracy theory any number of opinions or interpretations are possible – that kind of goes with the territory. The ‘truth’ is subjective to individuals based on their natural intelligence, education and personal beliefs.
Nothing ‘wrong’ with this, but it has to be recognised that there is a difference between belief and fact. Believing in something doesn’t automatically mean it’s factually accurate. Respecting different views is part of being a balanced human being – as is respecting that others are able to form their own rational opinion based on the same ‘core’ information.
Adopting a view that ‘the masses’ need educating on a particular view is a dangerous position – one step away from a very dark Orwellian future, whoever that position is adopted by.
Of course this is just a personal opinion, but I would like to think that it’s as valid as any – and more balanced than some.
By: Becky Bbear on September 18, 2012
at 6:29 am
Becky Bbear — by your own research methodology, one may ultimately conclude that there are no conspiracies in the world, that there are no evil actions, and that the “middle path” that lies between all available information is the most logical choice to assume is correct. It sounds so reasonable and comforting, doesn’t it? So inviting. So uninterested in finding out what the facts really are…
If I were managing PR for the mafia, the mob, or a drug cartel, you would be hired! I am well aware of Fabian socialist provocateurial debate tactics designed by Saul Alinksy, that are specifically designed to “neutralize” problem facts by inserting doubt. Doubt does not require facts; it is a philosophy.
I am an investigative journalist. I dig deep, over a period of many years. The information I posted is correct. I am not going to post the volumes of well-documented information necessary to make my case, since this is a comment area in an online forum. I do, however, invite the reader to do their own research on the work created by these individuals, most of whom are investigative journalists (that is, they are not funded by private corporations) –
Niki Raapana
Joan Veon
Charlotte Iserbyt
Constance Cumby
Daniel Estulin
Dr. Kelly Ross, Ph.d.
Jeri Lynn Ball
Devvy Kidd
Peg Luksik
Chris Gerner
Detective Phillip Worts
Berit Kjos
James Delingpole
Michael Shaw
Paul Barnes
Nancy Levant
Bobby Garner
Darren Weeks
Dr. Michael Coffman
Tom DeWeese
Marilyn Ferguson
Benjamin Creme
So coincidental that nearly all of these people wrote about the same facts that I did. Perhaps you unintentionally insert doubt into this conversation. If that it the case, please simply note what you align with by doing so, and then also become educated before posting.
By: Spork on September 19, 2012
at 2:13 pm
Becky Bbear and others reading this thread… let me introduce you to Berit Kjos…
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/brainwashing.html
“This shift from factual education to feeling and experience-based learning began over seventy years ago. Through the decades, the strategies used to manipulate minds in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany were developed, first at the Tavistock Clinic near London and later at Germany’s Frankfurt School (originally called Frankfurt Institute for Social Research). Their mind-bending methods soon spread to a rising number of psycho-social research centers in America. They were fine-tuned at Columbia, Harvard, Stanford and other American universities, at our regional educational laboratories [7] and at the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies where Elian Gonzales was remediated in preparation for his return to a Communist system.”
“Eventually, most students become conditioned to see everything through the new politically correct mental filter. The sight of an old social symbol (i.e. flag) or the sound of an word they have learned to hate (pastor, evil, capitalism, etc.) can now trigger emotional reactions that cannot be resolved with facts and logic.”
By: Spork on September 20, 2012
at 11:08 am
Including an educational video from UN expert Joan Veon. The video goes into detail about the Bank of International Settlements, which Becky Bbear seems to suggest is not worth your time exploring since it’s agenda is so obviously interested in your well being.
Joan Veon When Central Banks Rule the World
Part 1
Part 2
How may UN conferences have you been to, Becky?
By: Spork on September 20, 2012
at 11:16 am
None. However I have to say I’m really impressed with the depth of your research and sources.
Of course for every expert opinion (and we are ultimately talking opinions here) there is a counter-opinion and associated research.
I absolutely agree that people should form their own opinions based on full consideration of the available information.
Your quoted sources are as valid as anyone elses in that respect.
The only thing lacking from the debate is actual evidence in support. When two (or more) jounalists are reporting on each others treatment of an issue or citing each other as a source, that’s not fact – that’s opinion or discussion.
I think I already said there are no ‘winners’ or ‘losers’ in any debate, only shared information/opinion each can take away to consider/act on as they wish.
Granted this forum has a intelligent and informed following, which I think it does, I’m comfortable for readers to form their own opinions without further comment.
I would however be genuinely interested in you contacting me outside the form to discuss further and let me consider the physical evidence you say you have gathered.
My email address is Sscarebbear@aol.com – but please note this invitation is only to discuss this specific subject.
Which sounds kind of a weird thing to say, but is just because I’ve had problems with another forum affiliate drifting off subject and getting a little too ‘personal’ for my taste.
By: Becky Bbear on September 23, 2012
at 9:50 am
Additional: As Joan says in her presentation – the Federal Reserve, just like all Central Banks, prints money ‘on demand’.
That ‘demand’ comes from Government – no Central Bank having the power or authority to print money, unless instructed to by Government.
This applies to Central Bank lending to other institutions, the loans being drawn from sums authorised by Government.
Quite a way from Global Dominance when you still have to act on the instructions of individual Governments, each with their own individual demands and financial agenda.
Overall – I think the world is safe for a while longer.
By: Becky Bbear on September 23, 2012
at 10:51 am
Central bankers are their own government. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is not held accountable to any government. The BIS strong-arms governments into borrowing money at interest. If governments do not comply, they see their politicans voted out due to collapsing currencies and economies, as brought about by the BIS. How did you think 180+ countries managed to sign UN Agenda 21 at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, all very much under the radar of the world’s media at the time?
Check the sources above. It’s all there. It’s appears that Becky’s goal here is to ensure your never do your own digging. A passive, uneducated citizen becomes an enabler, by default. That’s a win for the central banking factions.
Becky’s posts are not for me. They are designed for you, reader. They are designed to ensure you gather doubt and become an enabler. Read Becky’s posts carefully. She throws out 99% of the sourced material and quotes only that which fits “her” agenda here. You will never know this unless you check the sourced material yourself — not a quick scan, but taking weeks to read.
By: Spork on September 25, 2012
at 3:30 am
@ Spork
We agree with YOU
Becky is a working girl online, she’s possibly even a boy and most likely a cop of one shade or another.
By: rmiglobal on September 25, 2012
at 4:37 am
“Sock puppet” comes to mind.
By: Spork on September 27, 2012
at 1:44 pm
Actually no big secret – Yes I am a ‘cop’.
I work with the anti-gang taskforce of Portland Police in Oregon USA. I’m also a 1st year law student at Concordia U.
Does this make a difference to my opinions/comments?
Last I looked I was still a ‘girl’ – although since I’m 24 I kind of think ‘woman’ is closer to the mark ‘guy’.
Perhaps I was mistaken in thinking that the purpose of forums like this was to enable intelligent and open discussion on a range of topics of public interest associated with global finance, politics and the environment.
Seems unusual that a forum moderator would make personal comments about a user – ‘working girl’ has a particular meaning some women would consider offensive – but I forgive you, after all everyone loves the muppets and they are ‘only’ sock puppets worked by others.
Anyway – to review, making a connection between national/global financial institutions and the elective processes of nation states (in terms of underpinning ‘control’ of those states) requires more proof than speculation, or regurgitated conspiracy theories circulating on the web.
I’ve explained why and invited those interested to form their own opinions on the subject – what more is there?
Since I have no interest in getting into an argument, or disrupting the more serious work of the Institute, I’ll leave those who read this particular thread to form their own opinions – or sign up to the White Rabbit Trust group on Facebook, a place where open debate on all matters financial is welcomed and all opinions/information are respected.
Becky –
By: Becky Bbear on September 30, 2012
at 7:06 am
@Becky
This isn’t an open forum. It’s Runnymede Institute’s blog.
Anyone is welcome to comment and we have the right to pan the preposterous.
Maybe you should take up a useful career, in plumbing perhaps…. lawyers especially don’t impress us
By: rmiglobal on September 30, 2012
at 10:19 am
Guess that depends on your view of what constitutes preposterous, seen how much plumbers charge by the hour – LOL.
Fair comment though, it’s your blog so you get to set the ground rules – I can respect that.
Apologies to anyone offended by my input – not my intention and if you would prefer for me not to offer any further comments on posted topics that catch my eye, just say so. I’ll respect that decision too.
Spork – Sorry for challenging your contributions.
Becky
By: Becky Bbear on October 2, 2012
at 6:20 am
@ Becky
JT here, the regular web guy.
You’re welcome here as much as anyone to challenge contributions but they have to make sense, not deviate from the topic so you can indoctrinate other visitors in ‘learned helplessness’ with your left comments. Perhaps it’s the police training rising to the surface rather than a paid troll job but it makes you stick out like a sore thumb. And everyone noticed.
If you visit out of personal interest alone…forget earning that law degree, there is no Law only corporate policy. I should know, I’m also RMI’s lawyer. The system is going to hobble along and die it’s death in 2016. If you’re still a cop by then there won’t be any doubt whatsoever that you’re one of the bad guys protecting the charlatans who collectively rob us blind.
The topic here is fake nationalists staging a ‘sympathy gathering’ production where nobody was really shot or killed. Where the hell are your police brothers in the Montreal cop shop? Who are THEY Protecting and Serving? The same people you are?
By: rmiglobal on October 2, 2012
at 9:46 am
Hi JT – Stuart mentioned you had joined the team as it’s lawyer, said you were pretty smart.
On that basis, lets review:
(i) A rally is disrupted by a gunman who allegedly shoots someone dead.
(ii) The evidence of the crime is the gun, the dead body, various witness testimony, forensic evidence that the fatal shot was fired by the weapon recovered at the scene, fingerprint and residue evidence and the confession of the murderer.
(iii) Speculation is raised that the crime never in fact happened, but rather was a staged event intended to sway public opinion in a particular direction.
(iv) Would any reasonable person hearing such a case in Court and considering the evidence presented base their decision/verdict on the evidence, or on the speculation?
(v) A reasonable person may form the opinion that in the abscence of any evidence of the victim rising from their coffin and walking away to get paid, along with everyone else involved – including the Police, Medical personel, funeral directors, the victims family, the gunmans family, the forensic scientists, lawyers, Judge, Jury, Court appointed psychiatrist, photographers and all those responsible for the gunmans detention/custody pre-trial, the balance of ‘probability’ was in favour of the commission of the crime of murder by that person at that time and place.
(vi) A reasonable person may also consider the motive for so many individuals to participate in a staged event of this nature – and the inherent difficulty in ensuring that none of these subsequently discussed the matter with anyone outside the sponsoring group.
(vii) They may also consider the ‘benefit’ gained from such an action. In the short-term, public opinion may well shift in favour of the purposes promoted by the rally – however in the long-term this initial sympath/empathy shift is unlikley to have measurable effect due to natural ‘fade’ of attention span.
Given the above, a reasonable person may form the conclusion that murder was committed and that the associated speculation is just that – speculation which itself favours a particular ‘vested interest’ or viewpoint without reference to any actual supporting evidence.
The whole point of my initial comments on the subject was that un-necessary publication of events like this can contribute to similar actions on the part of others with similar mental health issues and a desire to gain attention through acts of violence.
I stil think that was a valid comment, non-controvertial and relevant within the context of the article.
I don’t particularly think that any of my posted comments deviate from the topic, they simply highlight the need for informed consideration and an openess to consider all of the associated implications involved.
For the record, since it seems to have become an issue all by itself, I comment out of personal interest alone. The nature of that interest is by definition personal, but I would suggest not particularly harmful or challenging – except possibly to those unwilling to assume an open-minded position on the subject.
It would of course be an entirely different matter if there was physical evidence that no crime had been committed. It would be interesting to see the Instutute, or anyone else, post such evidence – clearly the effect on public opinion would be immediate and long-term.
Since that is very unlikely to happen – my ‘vote’…if I get one…is that we all consider this thread closed, apart of course for any final comments/observations you may care to make on behalf of the Institute (or personally).
Becky
By: Becky Bbear on October 7, 2012
at 7:59 am
@ Becky
All you wrote is hearsay, literally, ask your cleverest law professor. In the first instance, if there is a photographic courtroom image published, still or moving, it’s not a Court of Law! Anywhere, anytime…
it’s more correctly called a ‘Set’ and it has ‘Scenes’ like those attributed to crimes, real or purported. Genuine actions are limited to using illustrators.
Everything you’ve ever seen in the papers or TV, OJ trial included, is bogus. Then there’s the lawsuits from friends and family that always surface in real crimes yet are consistently absent from a sensational media circus. No ‘bona fide’ lawsuits means it’s all faked, case closed.
Scary cautionary tales raise oodles of black revenue and benefit ‘actors’ on the make plus policy enforcers like yourself with job security for life. Of course nobody will speak up, a scam this good begs to be repeated and with ‘good’ people like yourself defending their false reality of danger at every turn, it’s reasonable to imagine there’s more horror schlock to come.
I’m based in Hong Kong, not a clue who Stuart is but thanks for the empty flattery. They must teach that tactic at the Academy… Lee Strasberg’s I mean… lol
Break a Leg
By: rmiglobal on October 7, 2012
at 9:18 am
Quick response – sadly lacking in substance, I have to say I expected more than simply ‘it’s true because I say so’.
Stuart is Stuart Russell Cocks – one of the founders of the Instutute with whom I had the pleasure of exchanging quite a long series of emails on related topics. He’s also one of the founders of the White Rabbit Trust group on Facebook, of which I was very briefly a member.
The ‘flattery’ wan’t false, I genuinely thought you were the same person Stuart had told me about.
Obviously I was wrong, so please accept my apology for mistaking you for that person.
Heresay of course works both ways – and as everyone knows, speculation is essentially heresay.
Consider my leg well and truly broken – LOL. An expression which in theatrical circles means ‘Good Luck’.
Thanks, but somehow I don’t think I need it, your disapointing response should be more than enough for anyone taking the time to read through this thread.
And ultimately that was all I wanted people to do – consider ALL aspects of a subject and form their own reasoned opinion.
10/4 – signing out.
By: Becky Bbear on October 7, 2012
at 10:02 am
There is no founder or Fellow at Runnymede Institute named Stuart Russell Cocks. Your thesis melts away. Goodbye
By: rmiglobal on October 7, 2012
at 6:12 pm