Review of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Clesea (TMO) Tenant Management Organisation’s inaction at a Central London Court on the 3rd of August 2011. The prosecutor and judge both abandoned the court then proclaimed an adjournment due to the defense’s dismissal, submitted by Affidavit the previous day. How it will end is anyone’s guess but the challenge to extortionate bureaucracy has them in a quandary!
I find this posting a very valuable addition for my future knowledge on this exaustive subject, I have had huge problems in the past with trying to have a Notary sign and stamp my Affidavit claiming complete control over my Commercial Corporate Name, as a matter of fact every Notary which amounted to 5 refused to bear witness and would not sign & stamp the document as presented, their argument was that in their opinion it was an American Affidavit and could not be dealt with here in the UK , as a matter of fact the notaries ran away from me and huffed and puffed and asked me to leave there premises, so far to date my perfectly produced Affidavit lies on my shelf awaiting the breath of life to bring it into frutation, my comprehension on this matter is that the commercial name is the start and the finish of the matter, as when you have full copyrights in all its shape and form to the “ALIAS” then that stands behind and removes all controversay…..
By: AP O` Byrne on August 11, 2011
at 2:09 pm
@AP
Much new information is revealing itself. The guys are confident they’ll have more success in the next round, which is a couple weeks away. Know what you mean about Notary apprehension. Who wants to give the lucrative game away?
By: rmiglobal on August 11, 2011
at 4:43 pm
A man’s verbal testimony as first hand knowledge is surely adequate without the need of Affidavit’s signed by Notaries and where you yourself have probably taken Oath (does doing this make you a heretic?) The ‘Legal Name’ as we now know is a ‘Presumption of Law’ and has no specific ‘owner’ as such.
In addition, I have concluded personally that there is a more serious presumption going on and that is that you are in Peonage (Involuntary Servitude). Peonage being when one has to serve as a Slave to satisfy a ‘Debt’ (Government ‘Pawning’ People (man) in Peonage to pay off the Debt that the ‘Corporation’ called UK Plc accumulated (quite deliberately) in 1931.
The UK Plc being Bankrupt and then offering the people as the Debtor’s in Peonage. This is the reason for the establishment of the IRS/HMRC etc who are obviously private companies collecting from the Debtors by way of Tax.
If one looks at the fact that Banks can only lend to ‘Heretics’, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lombard_banking
Then it seems we are regarded as Heretics as well as Slaves.
The Government (under plausible deniability) Pawning off the people into Peonage (Pawnage) as Indentured Servants to the alleged ‘Creditors’.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pawn_broker
Then as we are all ‘Heretics’ and ‘Slaves’ by presumption as we have never ‘rebutted it’ in any way they can happily monetise Sins/Indulgencies.
Anyway, good work above, the curtain is certainly lifting. It’s time to rebut their utterly ridiculous presumptions and establish oneself in the office of General Executor of the Trust entity called ‘Legal Name’ and start Directing.
By: Tel. on August 18, 2011
at 8:41 am
Hi to all this posting is music to my ears, all as pointed out is bang on and we need to get behind this case full throttle, yes yes this is the way forward and thank God we have Brave and strong hearts who are not afraid to take on these Corrupt and Insidious corporate Gangsters, as and if we all move forward in unison helping one another and especially these people fighting in Chelsea who are fighting the greatest battle for and on behalf of each and every one of us, we must beat the bastards at all costs to free us all from Slavery & Bondage and in the name of all who have died and gone before us not knowing who they were
By: AP O` Byrne on August 18, 2011
at 11:06 am