Posted by: rmiglobal | June 26, 2011

The Madness Of Richard Gage: RIBA Takes Heat For 9/11 Lecture

 

The meeting at Great Portland Street last Monday night was never meant to be a rabble-rousing event by any stretch of the imagination, we wouldn’t expect such behaviour from experienced architects, engineers or any of their most meticulous colleagues. Information in the public domain was presented from a different point of view and was highlighted by the fact all the government’s 9/11 ‘facts’ don’t add up.

A quiet storm in UK media accusing the Royal Institute of British Architects of joining in speculation to discredit the ‘official narrative’ of the 9/11 story prompted a fully expected response that they merely rent ‘space’ and disbelieve the content of Mr. Gage’s lecture, without ever having heard it. No surprises there, attempts to quash enlightenment follow the usual modus operandi, with dastardly dirty tricks aplenty.

In the spirit of Goebbels and Hitler, the government still believes they can support a lie by creating larger ones against dissenters and punishing those who would give a forum to any ideas other than those officially sanctioned. It was a tragedy, the guilty Muslims have several wars prosecuted against them and we should all go back to sleep in case the monster re-appears. Who do you like for Dancing with the Stars?

For anyone un-familiar with Gage’s efforts, it’s most simply summed up that apart from the idea shoddy construction regulation in Lower Manhattan could explain away the anomalies, anybody with half a brain and a TV set would describe that fateful day as the greatest controlled demolition, eva. In his experience, Gage had never seen steel girders behave in such a way and was gobsmacked officialdom didn’t care.

From the outset, he tried to find a sensible explanation for the inexplicable and soon found himself the target of derision and contempt. If such a thing was possible, how could more skyscrapers be built if the specifications allowed for this sort of collapse? There was an obvious an attack on his profession that would surely hamper future construction of high buildings. How would he explain his own precautions to clients?

The man is not naive, he knew what was waiting for him with each interview the mainstream media mis-reported. He traveled far and wide to disseminate his thesis  but is wise enough to maintain his distance from anything other than the technical aspects in construction and his field of expertise. Others have taken up the slack where necessary, particularly in the field of economics where this case firmly belongs.

The public has a short memory by design, 9/11 was supposed to be consigned to the dustbin of history by now so any attempt to unravel the events of that day are to be considered disrespectful in the extreme by those who would have us believe the un-believable. Fortunately, independents in other fields have examined the same and revealed more unanswered questions that lead directly to the halls of power in DC.

The ‘sympathy’ collapse of Building 7 within the WTC complex, where no plane had struck provides the soundest evidence of misdirection on the part of the government and their lackey’s. It came down at freefall speed, all 47 stories of it but don’t look there, let’s talk about the twin towers and those evil-doing, turban-wearing, super high-tech James Bond villain cave dwellers who hate our ‘freedom’, a whole lot!

All this from the same mainstream media that once reported the rolling blackouts in California’s electrical grid as being caused by people who left their home computers ‘on’ all day and failed to point the finger at Enron’s dodgy dealings. Watch the now old documentary The Smartest Guys in the Room and you’ll get a good feel for how easily people can be cheated, with help from a callous mainstream press and their cohorts.

For the sheer size of the fraud, the Enron ‘story’ for some is too conspicuous by it’s absence. The chairman, ‘Kenny Boy’ Lay died (?) of a heart attack, his widow kept all his cash and a few top flunkies improved their tennis skills at VIP prisons. Things might have been different but the trouble was, all of the records of the case were stored in WTC Building 7 and went down in flames after Rudy Giulliani was hustled out.

When we consider that the US Congress and Senate are immune for Insider-Dealing charges and openly flaunt their ability to get away with treacherous acts normally punishable by incarceration, there’s no reason to expect anyone will come clean for 9/11 murders in cold blood. And we know that they know that we know they know;

Black Swans From New Normal
By: Jim Willie CB, GoldenJackass.com
“If truth be told, Harvard hatched the Enron monster from its Business School as a project, funded by Citigroup, where JPMorgan created all the off-shore companies to hide their dealings. Building # 7 in Lower Manhattan contained the records until it fell from structural sympathy. Harvard successfully made money all the way on the Enron runup, but also successfully shorted Enron all the way down.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories