“Michael Mann is a respectable and dedicated scientist. Likewise, Phil Jones and the rest of their colleagues implicated in the Climategate scandal that derailed agreement at Copenhagen not so long ago. They didn’t lie or mis-state any data whatsoever! Environmentalists don’t understand because they’re not versed in the hard sciences, they’re not even aware of the meaning of ‘peak-oil’. The ignorance of the general public must be countered by governments to avoid looming catastrophes!”
Quoting this individual is necessary but considering the rest of the rant, naming him would likely earn us a couple of years in the court system and the destruction of our own reputations, Gaddafi-style. As legal terminology goes, saying; “Climate Change is real” isn’t necessarily an affirmation of the big fat lie that CO2 is a valid problem.
Words and their misapprehension are the greater part in any litigation. Bill Clinton made it clear that his guilt depended on the true meaning of the word ‘IS” and legally he was correct. When we examine the true intent of this new CC word combination, it’s easily determined that it has nothing to do with weather but rather the political climate; “There’s a new Sheriff in town and his name is Joe Stalin! Got that Hoss?”
Carbon pimps aren’t about to give up their scam to tax the air we breathe, all of Europe is implementing measures against the will of the public. Worst of all, tax projections in countries like Ireland and Greece are directly tied to the bailout re-payments so there’s no choice but to gang rape the rational citizenry to satisfy insolvent international banks. Socialism and corporate welfare go hand in hand!
The word climate denotes many things other than a turn in the seasons just as Federal Reserve is used as pretence to government’s domination over a private corporation when it’s actually the other way around. Adding the word change deflects from any possibility the layman will look into it further and accept the dire warning as a fact in the first instance, foregoing a call to the local Law Society to clarify the implications.
We didn’t pass up the chance, RMI conducted a survey of a number of these groups around Europe and confirmed Ministry of Agriculture and Climate Change is perfectly logical naming because it semantically states what they do, turn up the heat. A lawsuit against the forces of ‘good’ carbon demonisation will only work against the scientists. Most lawmakers are lawyers and they’ll throw anybody who stands in their way under a bus, namely, the money-grubbing, doctored data clowns. Piled High and Deep etc.
There’s no escaping their brilliance in every field that should be avoided. As Britain proudly announces a scientific leap, that cloned meat would soon be introduced in supermarkets without specific labeling, we’d like to know if those cow farts contain less methane than the natural kind. Why do we need to clone animals at all? Scientists need to be kept busy or they might join Al-Qaeda! We must therefore entrust them with the most dangerous substances to mix and match to their heart’s content.
If experience is anything to go by, that’s the same as leaving a pack of matches with the toddler of the house, he’s going to get curious and strike one in the wrong place at some point. Naturally, this takes us to the nuclear disaster they’re predicting may last 100 years, for Japan and a soon to be irradiated world. Now that’s bloody optimistic! Same mentality, same cataclysmic results. Is it time for a real Regime Change?